Leave DAT Alone
 |
| by Carl Clegg |
 |
Digital audio has made brisk strides during the past
decade. Compact disc (CD) technology, in particular, has
gained a large share of the American music market. But the
wave of the future may very well be digital audio tape (DAT).
DAT has a lot to offer. Already standardized, DAT
recorders are sold in Japan, and on a limited basis, in
Europe. The DAT cassette -- about half the size of a
conventional analog cassette -- can store two hours of
CD-quality music. The principal advantage of the DAT recorder
over the CD player, however, is recordability. This very
asset, in fact, is responsible for the current ban in the
United States on DAT technology.
The impetus behind the DAT embargo is an effort to
appease the prerecorded-music industry. Their chief concern
is that bootlegging will cut into their profits. While their
concern is legitimate, their solution is not.
The record industry is advocating laws which would coerce
DAT manufacturers into equipping each DAT recorder with a
copy-code chip. These chips would inhibit the recording of
specially encoded CDs or, for that matter, any encoded medium,
including prerecorded DAT cassettes.
Record company executives contend that DAT would be an
open invitation to piracy. In reality, however, copy-code
chips would violate consumers' right to make copies for their
personal use, which is permitted under copyright law.
Copy-code regulations also would be unenforceable. Just
as technophiles found a way around video scramblers, they
would find a means to override the copy-code chip.
Furthermore, the current DAT embargo has simply moved DAT
sales underground. Any law, such as the copy-code law, which
is widely viewed as unfair and is easily circumvented breeds
disrespect for all law.
The high resolution of the CD offers the closest thing to
"live" music. Critical listeners, however, who have performed
comparison tests between coded and uncoded music, claim that
the encoding is annoyingly obvious and seriously detracts from
the quality of prerecorded music. Since all prerecorded music
(and presumably, radio broadcasts, too) would be encoded,
virtually everyone would suffer, not just the DAT owners.
One of the most offensive inferences of the copy-code
proposal is the presumption that all potential DAT consumers
are criminals. Those most offended, of course, are homerecording
buffs -- those who enjoy recording not prerecorded
music, but their own creations. Under the copy-code law,
anyone wishing to purchase a DAT recorder would be forced to
buy a copy-code chip -- an accessory he probably doesn't want
and shouldn't be forced to buy.
Perhaps record company executives should take a
retrospective look at the conventional analog cassette.
When it first became popular, the cassette was feared by
record companies as a means for copy-pirates to poach music
off LPs. Today, by comparison, prerecorded tape sales --
especially with the advent of the Walkman -- exceed the sales
of LPs and CDs combined. Since a prerecorded DAT tape would
sound at least as good as a CD, record companies may be
working against themselves by crippling a future market.
One way to deal with the problem of DAT piracy might be a
stiff penalty for criminal trafficking of pirated tapes. We
also should look to the free market to generate its own
solutions. The personal-computer industry, for example, has
done amazingly well without the "help" of anti-copying chips
(which, a few years back, were thought to be essential).
Software companies, in an effort to discourage unauthorized
copying, reward paying customers by offering manuals, future
revisions, and in many cases, telephone trouble-shooting, at
little or no extra cost.
Record companies need to show more initiative. One
record company, for example, has addressed the dilemma of
multiple formats by offering a cassette copy with the purchase
of each CD. Far-sighted companies will spend more resources
on producing prerecorded DAT tapes, instead of trying to
ban and devitalize DAT. Consumers would have no need to copy
CDs if their favorite music were available on DAT. The best
approach to progress is not to resist it, but to adopt it.
Mr. Clegg is a student at Brigham Young University.