Tom Paine's Revolution
 |
| by J. Brian Phillips |
 |
Advocates of freedom often despair at the political
inertia that must be overcome to achieve our goals. At times,
it seems as if the freedom movement is progressing too slowly
to reverse current political trends. In this regard,
the American Revolution provides an important lesson.
Even after the Revolutionary War had begun, most
Americans, including many colonial leaders, favored
reconciliation with England. Most Americans still considered
themselves to be loyal British subjects, and were willing to
continue to do so, if only the King would correct his most
grievous transgressions. In early 1776 -- more than eight
months after the Battle of Lexington -- colonists suddenly
began to support the idea of American independence. This
dramatic change can be largely attributed to the work of one
man: Thomas Paine.
Paine was an undistinguished Englishman when he arrived
in Philadelphia in November 1774 armed with several letters of
introduction from Benjamin Franklin. Aided by Franklin's
letters, Paine quickly found work as an editor and chief
writer for Pennsylvania Magazine. Sharing Franklin's interest
in science, Paine wrote about the newest inventions of the
day, as well as political issues, but he remained a relatively
obscure addition to the American melting pot.
However, in January 1776 that began to change, when Paine
anonymously published a pamphlet titled Common Sense. While
the ideas expressed in the pamphlet weren't new, the approach
and comprehensive treatment were.
"[G]overnment," Paine wrote, "even in its best state is
but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one."1
The purpose of government, he held, is to insure the security
of the citizenry by protecting their rights. The central
issue of the war, he believed, was over what form America's
government should take. He went on to write: "I draw my idea
of the form of government from a principle in nature...that
the more simple a thing is, the less liable it is to be
disordered, and the easier repaired when disordered."2
To those who urged reconciliation because England was the
"parent country," Paine replied, "Even brutes do not devour
their young, nor savages make war upon their families."3
Then, Paine became one of the first to publicly proclaim, "The
authority of Great Britain over this continent, is a form of
government, which sooner or later must have an end."4
Loyalists to the King reacted quickly to Common Sense,
declaring the pamphlet's author to be ignorant of modern
history and thought. Some said that Negro slaves, Quakers,
and other pacifists wouldn't support the war effort. Charles
Inglis argued that Paine's conception of man's inherent
goodness was as flawed as the Hobbesian view that only force
and violence could induce men to live under a government.
Much as the Loyalists despised Paine, many supporters of
the Revolution held him in higher contempt. Indeed, John
Adams would later call him "that insolent blasphemer of things
sacred and transcendent libeler of all that is good...."5
Wealthy Americans feared that Paine's ideas were too
democratic, that he would advocate forcible redistribution of
wealth. Paine, however, never advocated such a policy, and
was an ardent supporter of free trade.
Despite these criticisms, Common Sense had an
unprecedented influence on the minds of the American people.
Paine estimated that 150,000 copies were sold in the first
year; other estimates went as high as 500,000 copies. With
less than 3 million people in the colonies at the time, either
figure is astounding. Nearly every adult read the pamphlet --
less than seven months after its publication independence was
declared. Significantly, the author of the Declaration of
Independence, Thomas Jefferson, consulted Paine during its
drafting.
Paine, of course, wasn't the only writer to exert
influence on the American people. However, what he
accomplished provides an important lesson for modern advocates
of liberty.
The parallels between Revolutionary America and modern
America are striking. Most Americans today complain about
high taxes, government interference in their personal affairs,
welfare fraud, inflation, and other manifestations of
overextended government. Opinion polls show that most
Americans favor less government, at least in theory. When
questioned about specific programs and policies, however,
Americans favor the continuation of the status quo.
Just as colonial Americans were willing to reconcile with
a despotic King, modern Americans are willing to tolerate a
despotic Congress. As Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of
Independence: "all experience has shown that mankind are more
disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right
themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are
accustomed." It wasn't greater tyranny on the part of the
King that led colonial Americans to embrace freedom, but an
awareness of just how terrible conditions actually were.
Modern patriots can achieve similar results, but only if they
remain confident that their goals are attainable.
I hasten to add that we cannot expect laissez faire
capitalism to emerge shortly after the publication of a modern
version of Common Sense. Statism, and its ethical roots, are
too deeply ingrained for that to occur. However, if we are
more cognizant of the history of freedom, then our struggle is
far more tolerable. And more significantly, the length of
that struggle may be shortened.
Philosophically, the American Revolution was a product of
the Enlightenment. More than any other writer of his time,
Thomas Paine made the ideas of the Enlightenment -- individual
rights and economic freedom -- accessible to the public.
These ideas remain a part of the American culture, if only
implicitly. The emergence of the entrepreneur as a modern
hero is evidence of this, as is a greater willingness to
consider private alternatives to functions traditionally
provided by government.
More than 200 years ago, one man -- Thomas Paine --
provided the key that unlocked the door to freedom. When our
cause seems hopeless, we should remember this, for the
knowledge that success is possible is the fuel that will
propel us to our ultimate goal: freedom in our time.
- Thomas Paine, Common Sense (New York: Penguin Books,
1985), p. 65.
- Ibid., p. 68.
- Ibid., p. 84.
- Ibid., p. 87.
- John Adams, The John Adams Papers (New York: Dodd,
Mead & Co., 1965), p. 86.
Mr. Phillips is a free-lance writer based in Houston, Texas.