A Future That Should Have Been Ours
 |
| by John C. Sparks |
 |
I have a complaint. It's about something that has been missing from my
life-and from yours. It is about a future that should have been ours, but
isn't.
My complaint is addressed initially to our long- distant ancestors
who did not focus clearly upon their rulers and see them for what they
were- despots and tyrants who had no divine right to rule anyone. With a
few minor exceptions, this kind of government dominated until the
American Revolution, by which I mean the philosophical revolution, rather
than the shooting war that sprang from it.
If my complaint were in a court of law, the question ultimately
would be: What is the measure of my injury? How have I been hurt or
deprived of something I would have had? In other words, put a number on
it.
All right, let's try it. It has been just over 200 years since the
American Revolution, which produced a government with severely limited
powers, thus providing Americans with more freedom than any other
people who ever lived. It is unnecessary to detail the explosion of
knowledge, new products, advances in health, and other human comforts
that followed.
There is a direct correlation between freedom and a better liferunning
the gamut from physical health and longevity to cultural
achievement and luxury. This is no accident. Good government pro
tects its people from those who would take lives, interfere with peaceful
transactions, and steal property. When government does this and nothing
more, then each person is free to pursue his own ideas, make his own
peaceful choices-and human progress results.
Keep in mind this direct correlation-freedom and a better life-while
we apply a little imagination. The last 200 years of comparative freedom
produced the miraculous upsurge of products and knowledge we know
today, all because of the absence of bad government. This means that
these advances could have happened anytime before-if bad governments
hadn't been tolerated by our distant ancestors. It is conceivable that
people living in the year 1000 A.D., for example, could have reached the
same level of life we enjoy today! And thus we may be 1,000 years behind
where we should be. If we had not had bad governments centuries ago,
perhaps we could have a standard of living equivalent to what people may
enjoy 1,000 years from now.
Think about it. You can fill out a list of your own specific
complaints. Will you include the lost lives of your loved ones who could
have been cured of diseases or injuries had they had access to medical
knowledge that will be available 1,000 years from now? What other
possibilities are there?
But if human well-being is closely related to freedom, why do we
still enjoy a high living standard when our government has been
restricting freedom for most of the 20th century? The answer is that
freedom from the 1800s and early 1900s built up a momentum-a way of
freedom-based life-that bad government cannot destroy at once.
However, the development of new inventions, products, and methods
will be increasingly delayed, or may not happen at all. This will be
difficult to see, except when we compare ourselves with other countries
where freedom may grow. If there are no other places to compare with,
then we will fly blind, unaware again of what we are missing. The risk to
mankind is a repetition of the ignorance of the Dark Ages with progress
postponed and living standards held in suspension-or worse.
A good government protects the people's freedom and then gets out
of the way to let progress work its miracles. Our descendants deserve a
heritage of freedom equal to or better than ours. We must not deal them
out of their future.
Mr. Sparks, a retired businessman in Canton, Ohio, has served for many
years as a Trustee of The Foundation for Economic Education.