Here's the Liberator Online issue you are looking for. Please note that, since this is a past issue,
some of the links may not work. Thank you for your interest in the Liberator Online. Enjoy!
 
 
 
Volume 14, No. 15                                                                                  September 17, 2009     
 
The Liberator Online
for everyone who loves liberty
published by the Advocates for Self-Government
 
"The Advocates has been responsible for almost all the libertarian outreach tools you can find: from wallet-sized copies of the famous World's Smallest Political Quiz, to instructional tapes on communications skills and political activism, to the ubiquitous 'libertarian event in a kit': the Operation Politically Homeless (OPH) booths that you've seen at parades, festivals, and other events."
 
Henry Hazlitt Foundation (July 24, 2001)

 
 
 
NEW!

Get the Quiz
for your
iPhone!

Quiz for iPhone - button

Share the Quiz
with friends
AND
help the liberty
movement!
All proceeds
in September
go to the Advocates!

Download the app NOW

 
_____________________
 
















_____________________

Advocates banner
 
To be counted,
click on the
"Become a Fan"
button at the top
of our Facebook page.
 
_____________________
 



















_____________________

 
LIBERATOR
 
 ONLINE
SPECIAL OFFER!
 

 
 LIOL
 
Buy
 
DAVID BERGLAND'S
great book
Libertarianism
in One Lesson

now and get a wonderful CD absolutely FREE!
Find out more
 

 
_____________________

 
 








































 
 Help build a dynamic
movement for liberty!

liberty-bell
Learn more about the great things the Advocates is accomplishing -- and how YOU can make it happen!

________________


























































 
Books, DVDs, CDs, Quiz cards, OPH kits, T-shirts...
books
Find  great libertarian products
by shopping at
The Advocates
Liberty Store!


________________































________________

They're Back!

Great T-Shirts

Perfect for
OPH booths,
Townhall
meetings,
county fairs, etc.


Quiz T-shirt

tax shirt

Get yours today!

________________













































 
-- advertisement --
 
 

Fabulous ads
against
nationalized
health care!


 Heartland logo
Looking for
free-market solutions
to today's most important social and economic
problems?
The Heartland Institute has the information
and arguments you need on education, taxation, health care, privatization of public services, market-based approaches to environmental protection,
and much more.
 
Milton Friedman called the Heartland Institute "a highly effective libertarian
institute."
 
See why!
Visit
HEARTLAND INSTITUTE
today!

_________________





































































































































 
  Not only is
Michael Cloud
an expert
on persuasion --
he wrote the book
on it!

 
 








































































































































 
Dr. Mary Ruwart
shows how libertarian ideas can solve the world's most pressing problems -- including poverty, pollution and war.

Healing Our World

"Great message!"
-- bestselling author Wayne Dyer.

Find out more and order your copy today!

__________________
































































































 
Are YOU on

Facebook log
 

 
So are we!
 

 
See how you can use our acclaimed World's Smallest Political Quiz Facebook app to spread the
ideas of liberty throughout the Facebook community!

____________________
 
WELCOME to the Liberator Online!

In This Issue


PRESIDENT'S CORNER
* The Quiz on iPhone -- and a special offer for you!

GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS, UNBELIEVABLE NEWS
* John Stossel's New Libertarian TV Show
* 9/12: Signs of the Times
* Yikes! "Cost of Government Day" Record High
* Seven Steps to Free-Market Health Care Reform
 
QUICK SHOTS:
Obama and Tony Soprano.... Trillions wasted on crummy government schools.... Pot hypocrisy....

PERSUASION POWER POINT #275

*
Civility, NOT Servility by Michael Cloud
 
ASK DR. RUWART
* One million teenagers in the drug trade?

ONE-MINUTE LIBERTY TIP
* Part Two: Answering Hostile Questions With the Amazing Ransberger Pivot
  
WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE ADVOCATES
* Advocates President at Illinois LP Convention
 
Sharon HarrisPresident's
Corner




by

Sharon Harris


iLiberty: the Quiz on iPhone -- and a special offer!


Exciting news: The World's Smallest Political Quiz is now available for the iPhone!
 
Thanks to longtime Advocates friend Hardy Macia and his company Catamount Software, you can now have the World's Smallest Political Quiz wherever you go.
 
Hardy's new iPhone app lets you instantly Quiz for iPhone - screentest your friends and acquaintances with the Quiz's 10 simple questions that predict their political leanings with startling accuracy. This Quiz app is fun -- it's a great conversation starter, activism tool, and a fast way to show liberty-minded people there really is a place for them outside the simplistic "Left-Right" political model.
 
You can purchase your Quiz iphone app for just 99 cents here. (Note: If you don't yet have an account at the Apple Store, you will first need to download the iTunes software and set up an account. The link will redirect you there if that is the case.)
 
Every iPhone Quiz purchased helps the Liberty Movement in two ways. First, millions of people use iPhones, and many of them constantly seek out hot new applications ("apps").
 
If we can get a critical mass of Quiz iPhone apps sold, the Quiz will move up the ranks in the Apple Store -- and hundreds of thousands of iPhone shoppers will encounter the libertarian-inclusive political map of the Quiz.
 
Quiz for iPhoneSecond, a portion of every purchase will go directly to the Advocates to help us in our efforts to build a large, successful libertarian movement. 

And -- your support will go even further in the month of September. Hardy has graciously agreed to donate 100% of the proceeds directly to the Advocates for the next two weeks!
 
UPDATE: Hardy has also agreed to MATCH DOLLAR-FOR-DOLLAR every purchase made during September -- up to a thousand dollars! So your dollar goes twice as far -- and your purchase of the Quiz app can help us raise $2,000 for liberty this month. Thank you, Hardy!
 
So get the Quiz for your iPhone today!

And please pass this along to all your friends.
 
Thank you!

* * * * * * * *

Welcome to 562 new Liberator Online subscribers this issue!

The purpose of the Liberator Online is to build a stronger movement for liberty. We do this by providing information about the libertarian movement, news analysis from a libertarian perspective, and, most importantly, information and resources on how to best communicate the ideas of liberty. Thank you for being a part of this!
 
Learn more about the Advocates and our work for liberty.
 
Learn more about libertarianism -- the philosophy of liberty.
 
-- Sharon Harris, President
Email: sharon@TheAdvocates.org
Good News,
Bad News,
Unbelievable News

 
by James W. Harris

John Stossel's New Libertarian TV Show
 

John Stossel -- arguably the highest-profile libertarian jourJohn Stosselnalist in the world -- is leaving ABC in October to join Fox News Channel (FNC) and Fox Business Network (FBN).
 
On FBN Stossel will begin a weekly show that may well be the most consistent, intelligent, ongoing presentation of libertarian views in television history.
 
Stossel says Fox has offered him the opportunity to air his uncompromising libertarian viewpoint much more often. And he is enthusiastic about the possibilities.
 
"I want to dig into the meaning of the words 'liberty' and 'limited government,'" Stossel recently wrote in his blog. "ABC enabled me to do some of that, but Fox offers me more airtime and a new challenge.
 
"I'm still considering what I will do with my own show, one hour each week. Economics certainly. Exercises in understanding libertarianism. My 'take' on the issues of the day..."
 
Fox says Stossel's show will feature "in-depth reports and discussions surrounding libertarian issues in the United States and abroad. Each week Stossel will be joined by experts to explore consumer-focused topics such as free-market economies, civil liberties, the business of health care, social security, and free trade."
 
Stossel will also appear regularly on various Fox News shows during daytime and primetime. And he'll host four hour-long Fox specials per year, similar to those that won him fame -- and controversy -- at ABC.
 
Stossel gained national fame through the ABC news program "20/20". He began there in 1981 and became a co-anchor in 2003. He has received 19 Emmy awards and has been honored five times for excellence in consumer reporting by the National Press Club.
 
Along the way, Stossel became increasingly skeptical of government. Eventually he became a full-fledged libertarian, and his libertarian views became a hallmark of his "20/20" reporting.
 
Here's something else noteworthy: the universal use of the word "libertarian" to describe Stossel by news outlets reporting his move to Fox. This is another sign of the growing acceptance of libertarianism as a distinct, valid and growing part of the American political landscape. Just a few years ago the word "libertarian" was so little used and understood that it would either have been omitted or followed by a lengthy explanation. Now it is taken for granted that readers will understand it.
 
And that's a victory for our side! 

9/12: Signs of the Times
 
"Sign, sign, everywhere a sign," sang the 1970s rock group Five Man Electrical Band in their hit song, "Signs." 

They could have been describing the September 12 Taxpayer March on Washington, DC. This anti-government Tea Party protest drew somewhere between 70,000 and a million or more people (depending on whose figures you believe), virtually all of them demanding far less government and denouncing Republican and Democratic politicians alike for saddling us with the current welfare-warfare state.
 
Lots of these marchers carried signs -- handmade, hand-lettered, and from-the-heart passionate. These were sometimes funny, sometimes moving, occasionally offensive, and frequently thought-provoking.

sign at 9-12 march

 
(Photo by Andrew Aliferis.)

Here are a few of our favorites, culled from photos scattered across the Web:
 
"No Child Left a Dime"
"You Are Not Entitled to What I Earn"
"Don't Steal -- The Government Hates Competition"
"Our government needs to be small enough to fit inside our Constitution."
"STOP the March to SOCIALISM"
"Bankrupt America, Yes We Can"
"If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention."
"I'm Not Your ATM"
"NOBAMACARE"
"What would Mises do?"
"Change We Can't Afford"
"The IRS is 96 Years Old -- Let IT Die"
"Karl Marx is Not a Founding Father"
"HONK if I'm Paying Your Mortgage" (held by small child)
"STOP Spending MY future!" (held by child)
"Help me, Mr. Obama. They want me to work and stuff."
"As government expands, liberty shrinks."
"Party like it's 1773."
"Don't tax me, bro!"
"Silence is consent"
"Chains We Can Believe In"
 
... and we especially like this one, which pithily combines sound policy and common sense:
 
"LIBERTY: All The Stimulus We Need!"
 
Yikes! "Cost of Government Day" Later Than Ever Before
 
The average American had to work a record 224 days this year to pay his or her share of the cost of government.
 
That's the shocking claim of Americans for Tax Reform, a non-partisan organization that works for smaller taxes and smaller government
 
Each year ATR calculates "Cost of Government Day." That's the day of the calendar year when the average American worker is -- finally! -- finished paying off his or her share of the total cost of federal, state and local government spending and regulation.
 
This year, Cost of Government Day cost of gov't daydidn't arrive until August 12 -- the latest date ever. That means it took, according to ATR, an astounding 224 days before the average American had earned enough to meet the costs imposed on them by government.
 
Put another way, in 2009 the cost of government consumes a whopping 61.34 percent of national income.
 
Last year's Cost of Government Day date was bad enough: July 16, the fifth latest in 32 years. This year's record date breaks the old record (July 20, 1982) by fully 23 days.
 
"Bailouts, big budgets, cap and trade energy costs and government medicine move[d] Cost of Government Day one month later than last year," said Grover Norquist, president of ATR.
 
Chief reasons for the massive increase include:
 
*The $750 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) program last fall.
 
* The $787 billion stimulus bill.
 
* Overall federal spending, which consumes an incredible 30.36 percent of national income this year -- forcing the average American worker to work 111 days out of the year.
 
The Cost of Government Day report offers compelling evidence that America has entered a new era of big, big, BIG government. No wonder so many folks are feeling the pain -- and expressing their outrage.
 
Seven Steps to Free-Market Health Care Reform
 
President Obama is wrong in arguing for a government takeover of American health care system.
 
But he is right that the U.S. health care system is desperately in need of major reform.
 
health care - doctorLibertarians, while critical of the president's plan, must also be strong advocates of reform -- based on free markets, competition, common sense, consumer choice, and liberty -- that will make health care better and far more affordable for all.
 
The libertarian Cato Institute has created a Web site, Cato On Health Care Reform, that offers great resources for battling the takeover and arguing for freedom-based reform.
 
From that site, here are Cato's seven steps for free-market health care reform:
 
1. Let individuals control their health care dollars, and free them to choose from a wide variety of health plans and providers.
 
2. Move away from a health care system dominated by employer-provided health insurance. Health insurance should be personal and portable, controlled by individuals themselves rather than government or an employer. Employment-based insurance hides much of the true cost of health care to consumers, thereby encouraging over-consumption. It also limits consumer choice, since employers get final say over what type of insurance a worker will receive. It means people who don't receive insurance through work are put at a significant and costly disadvantage. And, of course, it means that if you lose your job, you are likely to end up uninsured as well.
 
3. Changing from employer to individual insurance requires changing the tax treatment of health insurance. The current system excludes the value of employer-provided insurance from a worker's taxable income. However, a worker purchasing health insurance on their own must do so with after-tax dollars. This provides a significant tilt towards employer-provided insurance, which should be reversed. Workers should receive a standard deduction, a tax credit, or, better still, large Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) for the purchase of health insurance, regardless of whether they receive it through their job or purchase it on their own.
 
4. We need to increase competition among both insurers and health providers. People should be allowed to purchase health insurance across state lines. One study estimated that that adjustment alone could cover 17 million uninsured Americans without costing taxpayers a dime.
 
5. We also need to rethink medical licensing laws to encourage greater competition among providers. Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, midwives, and other non-physician practitioners should have far greater ability to treat patients. Doctors and other health professionals should be able to take their licenses from state to state. We should also be encouraging innovations in delivery such as medical clinics in retail outlets.
 
6. Congress should give Medicare enrollees a voucher, let them choose any health plan on the market, and let them keep the savings if they choose an economical plan. Medicare could even give larger vouchers to the poor and sick to ensure they could afford coverage.
 
7. The expansion of "health status insurance" would protect many of those with preexisting conditions. States may also wish to experiment with high risk pools to ensure coverage for those with high cost medical conditions.
 
There's more on these reforms at Cato's site. And for still more bite-sized market-based health care reform talking points, try these:
 
* The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare: Eight things we can do to improve health care without adding to the deficit, by John Mackey, the libertarian CEO of Whole Foods Market Inc.
 
* Six Simple Ways to Dramatically Cut Medical Costs -- at Zero Expense to Taxpayers, by Liberator Online columnist Michael Cloud.

 
* Health Care Policy and Freedom, a wealth of information assembled by our friends at the Heartland Institute.

 ---------------------------------------------

Quick Shots...

OBAMA AND TONY SOPRANO: "Obama lambasted the critics who claim his reform plan amounts to a government takeover of the health care Shikha Dalmiasystem. But the plan he laid out Wednesday night will control every aspect of the medical transaction. It will tell patients when, what and how much coverage they must buy; it will tell sellers when, what and how much coverage they must sell. This is not a government takeover of health care? Then Tony Soprano is just a decent, hard-working businessman."
-- Shikha Dalmia, Forbes.com, on President Obama's health care speech
 
TRILLIONS WASTED ON GOV'T SCHOOLS: "Since 1970, inflation adjusted public school spending has more than doubled. Over the same period, Andrew Coulsonachievement of students at the end of high school has stagnated, according to the Department of Education's own long-term National Assessment of Educational Progress. Meanwhile, the high school graduation rate has declined by 4 or 5%, according to Nobel laureate economist James Heckman. So the only thing higher public school spending has accomplished is to raise taxes by about $300 billion annually, without improving outcomes."
-- Andrew J. Coulson, director of the Cato Institute's Center for Educational Freedom.
 
POT HYPOCRISY: "Hypocrisy is what bothers me. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is currently running for reelection. When asked years Tony Newmanago if he had smoked marijuana he said yes, and even added that he enjoyed it. Yet under Mayor Bloomberg, New York has the shameful distinction of being marijuana arrest capital of the world. Last year 40,000 New Yorkers were arrested and jailed on low-level pot possession charges. More people have been arrested on marijuana possession charges under Mayor Bloomberg than any elected official in history!"
-- Tony Newman, Drug Policy Alliance, writing at AlterNet.

* * * * * * * *
"Good News, Bad News, Unbelievable News" is written by Liberator Online editor James W. Harris. His articles have appeard in numerous magazines and newspapers, and he has been a Finalist for the Mencken Awards, given by the Free Press Association for "Outstanding Journalism in Support of Liberty."
Michael-CloudPERSUASION
POWER
POINT # 275

 
Civility, NOT Servility

by Michael Cloud

"America is becoming more and more uncivil," said a well-known public figure.
 
disagreement"We must return to civility if we hope to restore honest political discourse," said another.
 
"Political debates are becoming ruder and more heated," said a third.
 
Do these people truly want more civility? Or do they want servility?
 
Let's examine servility first.
 
Servility is slavish or submissive utterances or behavior. Cringing or yielding. Usually exhibited by social inferiors to their "betters."
 
Servility poisons a free exchange of ideas. For true communication is possible only between equals. Servility is the trait of obedient servants, not free and independent men and women.
 
When public figures demand that "ordinary citizens" stop bickering, that the "common people" shut up, sit down, and listen to those in charge -- they are demanding that we be obedient, submissive, and servile.
 
When I hear this demand for servility, I civilly respond, "No." (Though I think: "Like hell I will." Or: "Try and make me.")
 
Civility is polite or courteous utterances or behavior. Good manners. The act of showing regard or respect for another.
 
Civility is necessary for open and honest discussions. Especially when we disagree.
 
Yes, it is far easier to be civil when we agree.
 
But it is far more powerful to be civil when we disagree. Because civility lets us reach and persuade those who have not chosen sides. And it keeps people focused on the issue, rather than our behavior.
 
yes-noIt is harder to strongly disagree while remaining civil. Even more so to raise the issue of lying or hypocrisy or dishonesty.
 
How do you strongly criticize a government official while remaining civil? And do it in a way that persuades others?
 
1. Give a specific, undeniable example of the person's lie or hypocrisy or dishonesty. Especially a written or recorded example in the person's own words.
 
"On June 3rd, you gave a speech to public school teachers in Arlington. Your speech is on YouTube. Here's word-for-word what you said: 'We have to get more money for public schools. We need to pay teachers more.' But tonight, you're telling us that you will cut taxes and spending."
 
OR: "You filled out the VoteSmart candidate questionnaire last month. You said you will vote to keep U.S. troops stable in Afghanistan and Iraq for the foreseeable future. Yet tonight, you are telling us that you want to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq."
 
2. OR give a specific, undeniable, fact that contradicts or conflicts with what the speaker said. "Congressman X, the Congressional Budget Office did a study of the costs of your health care bill. They found it will cost $900 billion over 10 years. Plus it will directly cost an ADDED $500 billion for the 10.1 million Americans who can afford medical insurance, but choose NOT to buy it -- by legally forcing them to buy medical insurance. That's $1.4
trillion in ADDED taxes. Tonight you're telling us that your health care bill won't costs us the $1.4 trillion."
 
3. Then tell the person your reaction to the facts and contradictions -- in first-person, civil terms.
 
* "You made one political promise in Arlington and the opposite promise here. I don't see how I can believe your promises. I can't trust you."
 
* "You said one thing to VoteSmart -- and the opposite to us. You've lost my trust."
 
* "You tried to explain away your diametrically opposed positions tonight. And it became clear to me that I can't trust you."
 
* "After seeing your YouTube speech and listening to you tonight, I can't believe you or trust you or count on you."
 
* "Mr. Congressman, we did NOT come here to listen to you. You give speeches all the time. We listen to you again and again. I came here for YOU to listen to me. For YOU to listen to the other people here. I came here to tell you that I oppose this health care or bailout or stimulus bill -- and any others like it. Unless you vote 'no', I will vote against you this election. What's more, I will convince co-workers, family, friends, and neighbors to vote against you. We are NOT a special interest. But if you vote FOR the bill, we are 20 votes against you."
 
* "Senator, I did NOT come here to debate talkingyou. I came here to tell you, in person, that I oppose the bill -- and any bill like it. This is no minor issue for me. It's a deal breaker. If you vote for it, I will vote against you this November. And I will persuade my family, friends, co-workers, and neighbors to vote against you. Twenty votes."
 
When you speak from your belief, your trust, and your vote -- you are civil. You will reach other people in the audience. You will inspire others to think and feel and act like you. During the meeting. Later, with their friends. And on election day.

* * * * * * * *
Michael Cloud is author of the acclaimed book Secrets of Libertarian Persuasion, available exclusively from the Advocates.
 
In 2000, Michael was honored with the Thomas Paine Award as the Most Persuasive Libertarian Communicator in America.

 
Mary-RuwartAsk
Dr.
Ruwart

 
Dr. Mary Ruwart is a leading expert in libertarian communication. In this column she offers short answers to real questions about libertarianism. To submit questions to Dr. Ruwart, see end of column.
  
How can we get one million teenagers out of the drug trade?

QUESTION:
I believe that many young people are attracted to selling drugs because of the money that's involved. They see one neighbor working hard at a fast food place for minimum wage -- while another neighbor, involved in the drug trade, has plenty of money and drives a flashy car. That lifestyle draws them in. Do you agree?
 
MY SHORT ANSWER: I suspect you are right. According to a 2003 survey reported by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, more than 900,000 teenagers sell drugs.
 
For disadvantaged youth especially, drugsthe drug trade may well be the most accessible and lucrative profession open to them. The government adds to the economic woes of these kids by giving them poor educations in government schools, and then destroying hundreds of thousands of entry-level jobs through job-killing policies like minimum wage laws.
 
In contrast, the reason we rarely see kids selling alcohol is, of course, that alcohol is legal, and adults can easily and openly purchase it. But because drugs are illegal, a lucrative black market in drugs exists. And criminals are happy to offer kids a chance to make money selling drugs.
 
Today's War on Drugs is just repeating the mistakes of 1920s-era alcohol Prohibition -- on a far larger scale.
 
If we want to get one million kids out of the drug trade, the only way to do that is to end the War on Drugs -- just as America ended the horrors of alcohol Prohibition by repealing it in 1933.
 
LEARN MORE: See "Why do more than 900,000 teenagers sell drugs but not alcohol or cigarettes?" by Common Sense for Drug Policy.
  
* * * * * * * *
Got questions? Dr. Ruwart has answers! If you'd like answers to YOUR "tough questions" on libertarian issues, email Dr. Ruwart at: ruwart@theAdvocates.org
 
Due to volume, Dr. Ruwart can't personally acknowledge all emails. But we'll run the best questions and answers in upcoming issues.
 
Dr. Ruwart's previous Liberator Online answers are archived in searchable form.
 
Dr. Ruwart's outstanding books Healing Our World and Short Answers to the Tough Questions are available from the Advocates.

 
 Liberty Minute clock



One-Minute
Liberty Tip


Part Two: Answering Hostile Questions With the Amazing Ransberger Pivot

by Sharon Harris


Last issue I discussed the Ransberger Pivot, a remarkable communication technique that lets you defuse hostile questions and get your questioner on your side. The Ransberger Pivot is one of the most effective communication tools I know.
 
If you haven't read that column, I suggest you do so before reading further, or the following won't make much sense to you. You can read it here.
 
Now that you know what the Ransberger Pivot is, let's try it out.
 
Your questioner asks you: "You want to end welfare? What about the poor? Are you really that cold and heartless?"
 
Ransberger pivotRemember the Ransberger Pivot steps. Stay calm and don't fall into a knee-jerk retort. Think: What's the underlying concern here? Obviously, your questioner is against poverty, and wants to help those in need. That's admirable, isn't it? It's actually a great ideal, and one you share.
 
So use the Ransberger Pivot to establish that common ground. Try a response along these lines:
 
"Like you, I am saddened and outraged by poverty. I want the poor and needy to have more aid, more effective aid, and far more opportunities than they do now. I want a world of abundance and opportunity for all people."
 
Now, you can go on to have a fruitful discussion of the best way to achieve that goal. Again, you'll need the facts for your argument. The Ransberger Pivot doesn't give you that. But it does give you a more friendly, harmonious chance to convey those facts.
 
Some other Ransberger Pivot responses to typical questions:
 
"Like you, I want to live in a society where the streets are safe for our children..."

"Like you, I want clean air and water..."

"Like you, I want to know that the food and products I buy are safe..."
 
Here are a few more tips for using the Pivot.
 
1) It helps to memorize a specific phrase to kick it off. Notice above I used: "Like you, I want..." That's a proven favorite. One advantage of memorizing an effective phrase like this is that it will always be there for you to use. Don't rely on improvisation.
 
2) The Ransberger Pivot should be short. Just a sentence or two. It's just a way to turn the discussion around. You need time for the follow-up answer, the meat of your discussion.
 
3) Use the first person (whenever it is appropriate). Instead of "libertarians want..." say "I want." This more personal response helps establish rapport.
 
4) The Ransberger Pivot should only be used when you really agree with the listener's concerns (and most of the time, you will). It's the *opposite* of a trick or deception. It's a way of clarification.
 
5) It takes practice! It is NOT as easy at it sounds. Using the Ransberger Pivot does not come naturally -- especially when you're in the midst of a discussion. So prepare now. Make a list of difficult questions. Ask them to yourself, or even better, get someone to ask them to you. Practice Ransberger Pivot responses until it becomes a reflex.
 
6) Start your soundbites with the Ransberger Pivot! In the past, I've discussed the importance of preparing and memorizing soundbite responses to the common questions every libertarian is inevitably asked. Use the Ransberger Pivot at the start of your soundbites, when appropriate. It's a powerful combination!
 
Many libertarian communicators swear by the Ransberger Pivot. Give it a try!
 
* * * * * *
Sharon Harris is president of the Advocates for Self-Government. See more One Minute Liberty tips.

 
What's Happening
with the Advocates

 
* ADVOCATES PRESIDENT AT ILLINOIS LP CONVENTION: Sharon Harris will deliver the keynote address at the Libertarian Party of Illinois annual convention, October 23-25 in Collinsville, near St. Louis. For more information, contact the Libertarian Party of Illinois.
 
Follow up Links
About Us
THE LIBERATOR ONLINE, created by James W. Harris and Paul Schmidt, is the official newsletter of the Advocates for Self-Government.

Mail: 1010 North Tennessee Street, Suite 215, Cartersville, GA 30120
Phone: 770-386-8372. For orders: 1-800-932-1776
Fax: 770-386-8373
Email: info@TheAdvocates.org
WWW: http://www.theadvocates.org
 
Read previous issues.

The Advocates for Self-Government is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organization. Contributions to the Advocates are tax-deductible in the U.S.

"May it be to the world... to assume the blessings and security of self-government." -- Thomas Jefferson, June 24, 1826.
 
 

Read previous issues.

Subscribe today!

Make a secure, tax-deductible donation to help the cause of liberty!


Contents copyrighted © The Advocates for Self-Government,, a nonprofit 501(c)(3) educational organization. Donations tax-deductible in U.S. All rights reserved.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hit Counter