Volume 14, No. 3
February 20, 2009
The
Liberator Online
for everyone who loves liberty
published by the Advocates for Self-Government
|
"The
Advocates makes invaluable contributions to
the freedom cause.
For twenty years the Advocates has worked
tirelessly to
help libertarians better communicate the
ideas of liberty.
I continue to be impressed by the Advocates'
work."
Ron Paul
|
|
Buy
HARRY
BROWNE'S
Liberty A-Z
now and get 2 great CDs absolutely FREE!
Find out more
______________
|
--advertisement --
Look to FBS.net for a full range
of Internet services
including
the most advanced e-commerce
solutions
available anywhere.
Owned
and operated by libertarians
who
support
and
promote libertarian causes!
Check them out today
________________
|
|
when you support the Advocates!
________________
|
Help
build a dynamic
movement for liberty!

Learn more about the great things
the Advocates is accomplishing -- and
how YOU can make it happen!
________________
|
Books, DVDs, CDs, Quiz cards, OPH kits,
T-shirts...

Find great libertarian products
by shopping at
The Advocates
Liberty Store!
________________
|
|
-- Advertisement --
GLOBAL
WARMING:
Was it ever really a crisis?

March 8-10
learn from
the experts
at
Heartland's
International Conference on Climate
Change.
Find out more!
_________________
|
Buy
HARRY BROWNE'S
Liberty A-Z
now and get 2 great CDs
absolutely FREE!
Find out more
_________________
|
|
Not only is
Michael Cloud
an expert
on persuasion --
he wrote the book
on it!
|
Dr. Mary Ruwart
shows how libertarian
ideas can solve the world's most
pressing problems -- including poverty,
pollution and war.

"Great message!"
-- bestselling author Wayne Dyer.
Find out more and order your copy today!
__________________
|
Libertarianism
in
One Lesson
David Bergland

Acclaimed as the best short introduction
to libertarianism. A must for every
libertarian library, and a great gift
for anyone who would like to quickly and
easily understand what libertarianism is
all about.
Find out more and order your copy today!
____________________
|
Are
YOU
on

So are we!
See how you can use our acclaimed
World's Smallest Political Quiz
Facebook app to spread the
ideas of liberty throughout the Facebook
community!
____________________
|
|
|
WELCOME to the Liberator Online!
In This Issue
PRESIDENT'S
CORNER
* Using the Liberator Online for easy
outreach
GOOD NEWS,
BAD NEWS, UNBELIEVABLE NEWS
* Nobody Read the Stimulus Bill
* ACLU, Amnesty International Slam Obama
Administration
* 71% of Americans say: Investigate the Bush
Administration
* Obama Quickly Breaks Key Campaign Tax
Promise
* Government by Phone Book?
QUICK
SHOTS: Leave Michael Phelps alone...
Insult to injury, bailout-style....
PERSUASION
POWER POINT #263
* "If You Can Dream -- and Not Make Dreams
Your Master..." by Michael Cloud
ASK DR.
RUWART
* What will happen to Drug War prisoners
when drugs are re-legalized?
ONE-MINUTE
LIBERTY TIP
* Word Choices: Using "Once Again" by Sharon
Harris
WHAT'S
HAPPENING WITH THE ADVOCATES
* GA LP convention: Advocates President to
speak |
|
President's
Corner
by
Sharon Harris
Easy Outreach with the Liberator Online
Dear friend,
Thanks to all of you who have
commented on our colorful new look!
We're excited by the new opportunities this
format gives us to serve the liberty
movement.
Here's one example.
You can now easily forward an issue of the
Liberator Online to friends and colleagues.
Simply go to the end of the issue and click
"Forward email."
You'll be asked the name and email address
you want to forward it to. You can also add
a short personal note if you wish, although
it's not necessary. (You might, for example,
tell them about an article you think they'll
particularly be interested in, tell them you
enjoy this publication, and suggest they
subscribe.)
Then just press "Send." That's all it takes!
Your friend will instantly receive a copy of
the HTML newsletter, with a note telling him
that it was forwarded from you. Any personal
message you might have sent will also be
included. A brief note tells them this is
not spam, and if they wish to receive future
issues, they may subscribe.
It makes using the Liberator Online as
outreach easier than ever.
Please also note: We now have an animated
graphic link to the World's Smallest
Political Quiz in each issue. (It's at the
end of this one.) If your friend has never
taken the Quiz, you can suggest that he or
she try it.
Thanks for helping take the message of
liberty to the world -- now easier than ever
before!
* * * * * * * *
Welcome
to 157 new Liberator Online
subscribers this issue!
Learn more about the Advocates and our
work for liberty.
Learn
more about libertarianism.
-- Sharon Harris, President
Email: sharon@TheAdvocates.org
|
Good News,
Bad News,
Unbelievable News
by James W. Harris
Nobody
Read the Stimulus Bill
The massive $787 billion 2009 "stimulus"
bill -- possibly
the largest spending bill in U.S.
history -- was received by all
Congressional members at 11 p.m.
Thursday evening, February 12.
The gigantic bill was 1,073 pages long,
with an additional 421 page Explanatory
Statement.
Further,
portions of the bill consisted of
hand-written last-minute insertions.
As the small-government lobbying group
Downsize DC notes, the bill is
filled with:
* Hand-written copy-editing;
* Insertions scrawled in the margins;
* Typographical deletions of whole
paragraphs;
* And "a variety of curious hash marks
and other annotations."
Yet a mere 15 hours later, around 4 pm,
the U.S. House passed it --
appropriately enough, on Friday 13th.
The Senate passed it just 3 hours and 5
minutes later.
Yes, that's right. Congress passed this
complex, far-reaching, revolutionary
bill in a matter of hours, without
taking enough time to even learn what
was in it, let alone read it, or even
read most of it.
The conservative Heritage Foundation
declared: "[N]ever have we seen a
bill more cloaked in secrecy or more
withdrawn from open public exposure and
honest debate."
Downsize DC points out this happened
despite:
* President Obama's repeated campaign
promises of transparency in government,
including a pledge not to sign bills
that aren't posted online for the public
to read for at least five days before
the final vote is cast.
and:
* Speaker Nancy Pelosi's promise that
the final version of the stimulus bill
would be posted online for at least 48
hours before the vote.
ACLU,
Amnesty International Slam Obama
Administration
While fiscal conservatives are outraged
about the Obama $787 billion "stimulus"
boondoggle, civil libertarians are
alarmed at signs that Obama may be
backtracking on major civil liberties
issues.
On February 17 Amnesty International
sent out this email alert to supporters:
"Last week we got new, startling
evidence that the Obama administration
may continue the failed Bush policies on
torture and illegal detention.
"The first blow came last Monday, when a
lawyer for the new administration used
the same 'state secret' (or national
security concerns) argument put forward
by the Bush administration in an attempt
to dismiss the case of Binyam Mohamed,
who was reportedly brutally tortured and
detained without charges.
"Then
on Wednesday, before a key Republican
Senator, Solicitor General Nominee Elena
Kagan said she believed the government
had the legal authority to detain
suspected terrorists indefinitely,
without charges.
"We fear that the Obama administration
is feeling intense pressure for its
early, bold actions against Guantanamo
Bay and torture, and may be compromising
to win political allies."
The case in question is
Mohamed et al. v. Jeppesen. A few
days earlier
the ACLU had expressed similar alarm
and outrage. Anthony D. Romero,
Executive Director of the ACLU, said:
"[New U.S. Attorney General] Eric
Holder's Justice Department stood up in
court today and said that it would
continue the Bush policy of invoking
state secrets to hide the reprehensible
history of torture, rendition and the
most grievous human rights violations
committed by the American government.
This is not change. This is definitely
more of the same. Candidate Obama ran on
a platform that would reform the abuse
of state secrets, but President Obama's
Justice Department has disappointingly
reneged on that important civil
liberties issue. If this is a harbinger
of things to come, it will be a long and
arduous road to give us back an America
we can be proud of again."
Looks like it's going to be a
very
interesting political year.
71% of
Americans Say: Investigate the Bush
Administration
An extraordinary 71% of
Americans
support an investigation into the
possible misuse of the Department of
Justice (DOJ) for partisan political
purposes by the Bush administration.
63% of Americans support investigating
the Bush administration for engaging in
illegal wiretapping.
And 62% believe the Bush administration
should be investigated for the use of
torture.
That's according to a
Gallup poll released this week.
Those who want such investigations are
divided
as to whether there should be criminal
investigations, or investigations by a
"truth commission" panel offering
immunity in exchange for testimony. For
example, in the case of the 71% who
believe the Bush administration should
be investigated for abuse of the DOJ,
41% want a criminal investigation, while
30% are in favor of investigation by an
independent panel.
President Obama has shied away from
endorsing such actions. However, it
would appear a large majority of
Americans -- indeed, many millions more
than those who voted for him -- disagree
with Obama on this. Further, within his
own party, powerful voices are already
acting.
A House committee led by Rep. John
Conyers (D-MI) has already issued
subpoenas of former Bush administration
officials. Several days ago Senate
Judiciary Committee chairman Patrick
Leahy (D-VT) called for a special "truth
commission" to be formed.
"We need to get to the bottom of what
happened and why,"
Leahy said. "The reason we do that
is so that it'll never happen again."
For years, critics of the Bush
administration have compiled enormous
amounts of information arguing that the
Bush administration engaged in numerous
criminal actions.
It increasingly appears they may have a
chance to make their arguments in
official forums.
Obama Quickly Breaks Campaign Tax
Promise
Last year, candidate Barack Obama
repeatedly pledged that no American
earning under $250,000 per year would
face any form of tax increase should he
be elected.
For example, on September 12, 2008,
he declared:
"I
can make a firm pledge. Under my plan,
no family making less than $250,000 a
year will see any form of tax increase.
Not your income tax, not your payroll
tax, not your capital gains taxes, not
any of your taxes."
However, in early February, just days
into his presidency, President Obama
signed the State Children's Health
Insurance Program (SCHIP) legislation.
This puts into effect a 156 percent
increase in the federal excise tax on
tobacco, a hike of 61 cents per pack.
According to Americans for Tax Reform
-- a non-partisan coalition of taxpayers
and taxpayer groups who oppose all
federal and state tax increases --
Obama's new tax increase will be borne
largely by the very middle- and
low-income Americans he said he would
not raise taxes on:
* 55 percent of smokers are "working
poor";
* One in four smokers live below the
poverty line;
* On average, smokers, whose median
income is a little more than $36,000,
make about 30 percent less than
non-smokers.
"Obama just raised taxes on millions of
lower-income Americans. His central
campaign promise was a lie," bluntly
declared Grover Norquist, president of
Americans for Tax Reform.
Read my lips, anyone?
Government by Phone Book?
A
new survey by Rasmussen, the r espected
polling company, finds that fully
forty-four percent (44%) of voters think
a group of people selected at random
from the phone book would do a better
job addressing the nation's problems
than the current Congress. 37% disagree.
Twenty percent (20%) are undecided.
We confidently predict the latter two
groups will quickly shrink in the months
ahead.
---------------------------------------------
Quick
Shots...
LEAVE
MICHAEL PHELPS ALONE: "(S)moking
smoking pot didn't prevent Barack Obama
from becoming president. And obviously,
recreational marijuana use
hasn't
harmed Mr. Phelps, whose prodigious
performances have garnered 14 gold
medals, the most in Olympic history. If
he can smoke pot and perform at such a
superhuman level, then perhaps we should
reconsider the effects of -- and
punishments for -- use of the
substance." -- Psychologist
Stanton Peele, Wall Street Journal,
Feb. 5, 2009.
INSULT
TO INJURY, BAILOUT-STYLE: "The
Bush administration overpaid tens of
billions of dollars for stocks and other
assets in its massive bailout last year
of Wall Street banks and financial
institutions, a new study by a
government watchdog says. The
Congressional Oversight Panel, in a
report released Friday, said last year's
overpayments amounted to a
taxpayer-financed $78 billion subsidy of
the firms." --
Associated Press, Feb. 6, 2009.
* * * * * * * *
"Good News, Bad News, Unbelievable News"
is written by Liberator Online Editor
James W. Harris. His articles have
appeard in numerous magazines and
newspapers, and he has been a Finalist
for the Mencken Awards, given by the
Free Press Association for "Outstanding
Journalism in Support of Liberty."
|
PERSUASION
POWER
POINT
#263:
"If You
Can Dream -- and Not Make Dreams Your
Master..."
by
Michael Cloud
"When we achieve freedom, the economy
will flourish," the libertarian speaker
began. "Prosperity will be common.
Poverty will be eradicated. I can hardly
wait..."
For the next ten minutes, he spun out
fantasies of how great freedom was going
to be.
This dream was uplifting and inspiring.
"When we end the insane War on Drugs,
when we end drug prohibition, drug abuse
will be such a minor problem, we
probably won't even notice it," began
another.
For fifteen minutes, he held court as
libertarians imagined a world without
drug prohibition.
This dream was pure oxygen for people
suffocating from Big Government.
"In a self-regulating free market
economy, a laissez-faire economy, we'll
see safer, cheaper, and better products.
Ever-diminishing defects. Ever-shrinking
flaws," began a third libertarian
dreamer.
He showered possibilities and
likelihoods on the new libertarians who
had come to hear him speak.
This dream was exhilarating.

Libertarian dreams point us True North.
They ignite our passions and inspire our
minds.
They fuel our efforts.
They focus our energies.
We must begin with libertarian dreams.
Or we'll never begin.
But we cannot stop there.
Ayn Rand addressed this question in her
play "Ideal." Two characters wondered
why life was of no account. Who made it
so?
"Those who cannot dream," said one.
"No. Those who can
only
dream," answered the other.
Those who cannot dream of liberty will
never want it.
Those who can only dream of liberty will
never seek it. They will fantasize and
rhapsodize, but they will not act.
Does your dream of liberty inspire you
to act? Does it motivate and activate
you?
Does your dream of liberty whet your
appetite to do? Does it make you hungry
for a libertarian America in your
lifetime?
Does it toss you into conversations
about politics and economics? Does it
make you feel "I've got to tell
everybody about these libertarian
ideas!"
Does your dream excite and thrill you?
Does it get your feet tapping and your
heart pounding?
Does it set your soul afire? And do you
burn so brightly you've just got to
light the world for liberty?
Most people go through life without big,
bold dreams. Share yours with them.
Without dreams, there's a hole in our
hearts. We want dreams and we need them.
If necessity is the mother of invention,
dreams are the father.
To invent a better America, we must
dream liberty. A dream big enough to
fill millions of hearts. A dream big
enough to inspire and activate.
We libertarians are Dream Merchants.
When we talk with family or friends.
When we offer a libertarian solution to
a talk radio audience. When we write a
letter to the editor. When we run for
office.
We do not worship dreams. We work for
our dreams. We do not serve dreams.
Dreams serve us.
But
only if we work to make them real.
Only if we roll up our sleeves and act.
And only if we keep working on them and
for them.
We must love our dreams. Then we must
live our dreams.
"If you can dream -- and not make dreams
your master..." said Rudyard Kipling.
We can bring our libertarian dream to
life.
* * * * * * * *
Michael Cloud is author of the acclaimed
book
Secrets of Libertarian Persuasion,
available exclusively from the
Advocates.
In 2000, Michael was honored with the
Thomas Paine Award as the Most
Persuasive Libertarian Communicator in
America.
|
Ask
Dr.
Ruwart
Dr. Mary
Ruwart is a leading expert in libertarian
communication. In this column she offers
short answers to real questions about
libertarianism. To submit questions to Dr.
Ruwart, see end of column.
What will
happen to Drug War prisoners when drugs are
re-legalized?
QUESTION:
In a newly libertarian society where
marijuana and other now-illegal drugs were
once again legal, what would happen to the
huge numbers of imprisoned citizens in
prison for simple possession, distribution
or other non-violent drug-related crimes?
MY SHORT
ANSWER: Most Libertarian Party
presidential candidates have pledged to
release peaceful prisoners -- those in
prison for so-called "victimless crime" laws
-- as one of their first official acts. Many
other libertarians agree with this position.
In many cases, these people's only "crime"
is trying to feel good through a chemical
high. They are victims of government
oppression, not criminals.
Those who are addicted to drugs and are
unable to hold down a job or function well
in society need our help, not a jail cell.
In a libertarian society, people with a
substance abuse problem would be able to get
the help they need without the fear of being
incarcerated.
LEARN MORE:
In 1989, the Cato Institute published a very
thoughtful look at what might happen when
drugs are once again legal in America. It's
entitled
"Thinking about Drug Legalization," by
James Ostrowski. It's a pleasure to read and
it offers many answers to questions people
have about this issue. The entire report is
worth reading, but most relevant of all to
this question is the short conclusion,
entitled "Hope for the Future."
* * * * * * * *
Got
questions? Dr. Ruwart has answers! If
you'd like answers to YOUR "tough questions"
on libertarian issues, email Dr. Ruwart at:
ruwart@theAdvocates.org
Due to volume, Dr. Ruwart can't personally
acknowledge all emails. But we'll run the
best questions and answers in upcoming
issues.
Dr. Ruwart's previous Liberator Online
answers are
archived in searchable form.
Dr. Ruwart's outstanding books
Healing Our World and
Short Answers to the Tough Questions
are available from the Advocates.
|
One-Minute
Liberty
Tip
Word
Choices: Using "Once Again"
by
Sharon Harris
Change
makes many people uncomfortable. Some
people are unable to easily see how bold
change can take place. Many lack the
historical perspective or the
imagination. They are unwilling to let
go of today's failed policy, for fear
that the proposed alternative may be
worse.
This can make advocating some
libertarian ideas difficult.
It is therefore very useful to let
people know that some "radical"
libertarian ideas were actually the
status quo, not so long ago.
One excellent way to do that is
illustrated in the question Mary Ruwart
answers in her column in this issue.
The question is on the difficult issue
of drug legalization. The questioner
asks what will happen if drugs are "once
again" legal in America.
That use of "once again" is a marvelous
choice.
Saying "I believe the use and sale of
drugs should be legal in America" is
scary-sounding to some people. It sounds
like you are calling for a radical,
unprecedented change in the status quo.
But saying "I believe the use and sale
of drugs should
once
again be legal in America" adds
great power to your argument. It makes
it plain that this was once the norm in
America. That you are calling for a
restoration of the status quo.
This then offers you the chance to point
out that all drugs were legal in America
until well into the twentieth century,
and there were no federal laws against
marijuana until 1937. And America was
freer and safer because of this policy.
(Only 16 states had anti-marijuana laws
as late as 1930; by 1937, increased
federal pressure led the rest of the
states to adopt such laws.)
Of course, you will need to have your
facts ready on this. The article
recommended in Mary Ruwart's column,
"Thinking about Drug Legalization,"
by James Ostrowski, is a great source of
information on this issue.
For a similarly useful word on the drug
issue, we have previously discussed the
use of "re-legalization."
Regarding the "once again" phrase, here
are some suggestions:
"I believe Americans should once again
be free of the federal income tax."
"I believe Americans should once again
adopt our traditional American foreign
policy of a strong national defense but
no interference in the internal affairs
of other nations."
"I believe the residents of my state
should once again be free from a state
income tax."
You can come up with more. Make the
"radical" sound like what it so often is
-- a return to common sense -- with this
very useful phrase.
* * * * * *
Sharon Harris is president of the
Advocates for Self-Government. See
more One Minute Liberty tips.
|
What's Happening
with the Advocates
* ADVOCATES
PRESIDENT AT GEORGIA LP STATE CONVENTION:
Sharon Harris will speak on effective
libertarian communication at the
annual convention of the Libertarian Party
of Georgia, to be held April 18, 2009 in
the Atlanta, Georgia, area. (Sharon,
incidentally, was a founding member of the
LP of Georgia in 1973.) |
|
| |
|
|
|
About Us
THE LIBERATOR ONLINE, created by Paul Schmidt and
James W. Harris, is the official newsletter of the
Advocates for Self-Government.
Mail: 213 South Erwin Street, Cartersville, GA
30120-3513
Phone: 770-386-8372. For orders: 1-800-932-1776
Fax: 770-386-8372
Email: info@TheAdvocates.org
WWW: http://www.theadvocates.org
Read
previous issues.
The Advocates for Self-Government is a 501(c)(3)
non-profit educational organization.
Contributions to the Advocates are
tax-deductible in the U.S.
"May it be to the
world... to assume the blessings and security of
self-government."
-- Thomas
Jefferson, June 24, 1826.
|
|
| |
|