Farewell to Vaping in San Francisco?

Farewell to Vaping in San Francisco?

“We have nothing to fear but fear itself,” progressive patriarch and late President Franklin D. Roosevelt once said. What a world we live in where we literally fear what we don’t know, and then ban it or regulate the living daylights out of it so we’ll never know what we are actually afraid of.

This mindset seems to be in vogue in San Francisco where they are covered in poop and are banning electric scooters. The progressive city plans on following up with all that progress by now proposing a ban on vaping.

Politically moderate Virginia raised the age to purchase e-cig and vaping products while at the same time the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)  has ignored evidence that shows that vaping isn’t dangerous at all It only makes sense that San Francisco would join the anti-vaping hysteria caused by big tobacco.

Slate covered the widely unpopular proposal, in which contributor Shannon Palus correctly pointed out that the unintended consequences of this law would actually create another issue entirely.

“The problem with the proposed ban,” Palus said.  “Is that it wouldn’t just keep vapes away from teens; it would also keep them from an essential audience: adult smokers.”

Research has shown that e-cigs/vaping has caused a massive reduction in the overall population of adult smokers who thanks to this technology, are no longer at as high of a risk of cancer caused by the burning of tobacco (a carcinogen) and the other poisonous agents used as ingredients in cigarettes.

Palus continues, “In the end, the proposal raises the question: Why not just add old-fashioned cancer-causing cigarettes to the list of things not allowed in San Francisco too?” The answer is that it has never been about public safety, just about virtue signaling in order to tap into the public fears over teen vaping usage in order to score political points.

After all, the article states, “The lawmakers behind the San Francisco proposal say they just want the FDA to move faster on evaluating e-cigarettes’ role in public health. It’s true that the FDA has not vetted e-cigarette products—but it has a plan to do so by 2022.” Therefore it is a win-win for progressive lawmakers in San Francisco.

They appear to be leading the effort to save kids and show leadership, and even if nothing dangerous is found by the FDA, they still get to say they were doing it for the safety of children.

This is a political act, plain and simple, and because of this, adult smokers with addiction will fall back to cancer-causing cigarettes and consumers will have less market freedom because of policies backed by fear mongering.

Comment section

1 thought on “Farewell to Vaping in San Francisco?

  1. This article misses the overarching point.
    I agree about how politicians use “messaging” for their own aggrandizement but your “take” on vaping is all wrong. The chemicals delivered to the lungs by vaping are as bad (or worse) than those delivered by plain old cigarettes. They are also MUCH more addictive! They SHOULD be banned ~ and not just for teenagers! In fact, so should cigarettes and all other tobacco products.
    As an RN, I have witnessed the terrible health and loss-of-life costs of all kinds of tobacco products. WHY, on Earth, do we allow (and subsidize farmers’ growing) a product that has absolutely NO benefit, is KNOWN to cost our economy trillions of dollars in lost lives, dependent payments, disability payments, massive health care costs, etc. ??!?! Now, we are adding another way to get harmful and addictive chemicals into the lungs of our citizens.
    You can’t get a drug approved for sale by the FDA unless you can PROVE its effectiveness and absence of harm – yet, the same FDA (and Congress) allows the indiscriminate sale of tobacco and vaping products that have NO benefit and are ALL about harm?!
    Go figure! Oh, wait, we don’t have to go far to figure it out. Big money corporations = Super Lobbyists = BIG political donations = “Sure, sell what you want to the idiot masses who will use it” = the FDA’s stance of “This vaping is a BIG problem! We plan to aggressively study it …. and will start 3-4 years from now!” Too sad.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *