A New Approach is Needed With Iran
caret-downdownloadfacebook2rss2searchtwitteryoutube

A New Approach is Needed With Iran

Last month, Tahmineh Dehbozorgi, a campus correspondent for Campus Reform, penned an interesting piece on how America should deal with Iran.

Since the Islamic Revolution of 1979, Iran has been a thorn in the side of the American political establishment. This has prompted politicians from both parties to take harsh action against the country. In 1979, sanctions were slapped on Iran as a means of trying to punish the newly-formed Islamic government. Since then, the U.S. has maintained these sanctions and has added even more pressure on the country in order to force regime change, with little to no avail. As former Congressman Ron Paul wisely observed, sanctions only strengthen the countries being targeted, while everyday people suffer.

Although President Trump campaigned to stop the never-ending wars, his administration has maintained and expanded upon the same failed sanctions against Iran. Even worse, the administration has continued sending troops over to Saudi Arabia — Iran’s geopolitical rival — to try to counter its influence and intimidate it. This worries some people considering how American troops are in a hot zone and any kind of attack on American assets could provoke a hot war, something no one should be asking for at this moment.

Dehbozorgi raises an interesting point about the Iranian ex-pat population, one of the most skilled immigrant groups in the country. She notes that “Even though many disagree with the actions of the Iranian government, they favor better relations between Tehran and Washington and dismiss the dangerous rhetoric of war hawks like John Bolton, Hillary Clinton, and Sen. Lindsey Graham.” New Jersey Democratic Senator Cory Booker has even urged that the United States should “be more vigilant than ever in fighting Iranian aggression.”

However, there is still some prospect for peace with the Islamic Republic. Certain elected officials, like Congressman Thomas Massie, have not bought into D.C.’s hawkish ways. Massie voted against the extension of U.S. sanctions against Iran, is the only member in Congress to do so back in 2016. Similarly, Massie joined Congressmen Justin Amash and John Duncan Jr. to vote in opposition to the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act.

It’s becoming apparent that Americans have allowed defense contractors and ivory tower foreign policy bigwigs to call the shots on foreign policy for too long. Instead, the U.S. should heed the advice of retired Colonel Douglas MacGregor and pursue diplomatic options with Iran because a direct conflict could create a global conflagration.

Let’s be real. Neoconservative regime change fanatics and their neoliberal cousins portray Iran as the next Nazi Germany, but Iran is nowhere near the superpower they suggest. When factoring in how militarily advanced Israel is — it is also rumored to be a nuclear power that can counterbalance Iran. Additionally, Iran is in an alliance of convenience with China and Russia — who will likely play a mediating role in keeping Iran from pursuing irrational belligerency — the likelihood that Iran will cap off a hot war is increasingly small.

A more proactive way of dealing with the country is to open up dialogue and directly appeal to Iranian activists that yearn for reform. Trying to launch another regime change campaign in the Middle East would be a disaster waiting to happen.

Comment section

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *