Beta

Password Reset Confirmation

If an account matching the email you entered was found, you will receive an email with a link to reset your password.

Welcome to our Beta

The Advocates of Self-Government is preparing a new experience for our users.

User Not Found

The username/email and password combination you entered was not found. Please try again or contact support.

Skip to main content

Quizzes & Apps

Articles

Tag: tax burden

To Keep Property Taxes Low, Texas Will Need to Reform Education

According to a recent University of Texas/Texas Tribune poll, voters in the Lone Star State believe that property taxes are too high and the state is not spending enough on public education. Texas taxes education reform The majority of Texas voters are of the opinion that they pay too much in property taxes. Only 5 percent said they pay too little, and 26 percent said the property tax burden is just right. Among Democrats, 45 percent believe they pay too much. Sixty-three percent of independents and 59 percent of Republicans also believe property taxes are too high. On the question of public education, 50 percent of Texans think the state spends too little. Property taxes are one of the principal ways public education is funded in Texas. This was a major point of contention during the 2019 session of the Texas Legislature. The concerns of Texas taxpayers are warranted. Texas has made a name for itself by having no income tax, which has been a major selling point that policymakers have used to attract business and new residents. Nevertheless, the lack of an income tax has not fully contained politicians’ desire to raise tax revenues in other ways. According to Ross Kecseg of the conservative website Texas Scorecard, Texan households must shoulder, on average, a tax burden that is sixty percent higher than that of other states without income taxes. On the property tax front, the picture looks bleaker when comparing Texas to other states with no or very low income taxes. Texas households pay 83 percent higher property taxes than households in Washington, 102 percent higher taxes than in Nevada, 213 percent higher than in Wyoming, and more than 230 percent higher than taxpayers in Tennessee. Rising property taxes have been a feature in Texas politics over the past decade. James Quintero of the Texas Public Policy Foundation pointed this out when he revealed that statewide property taxes have climbed by 60 percent in the last decade. Texas’ rising property tax rates have clearly outstripped the population growth, which was 19 percent in the observed period. To get to the bottom of the property tax burden problem, Texas will have to address education spending. Education researchers Vance Ginn and Trey Berthelot of the Texas Public Policy Foundation discovered that education spending has increased by 7.6 percent from 2004 to 2016. Further, as spending has increased in the education sector, bureaucratic bloat has inevitably followed. From the fiscal year of 1993 to the fiscal year of 2015, student enrollment at public schools in Texas grew by 48 percent while non-teaching staff swelled by 66 percent and teachers grew by only 56 percent. In that time, there has not been an observable increase in the quality of education. Texas should start considering other options such as school choice and measures that begin to insert market dynamics into the education sector. Ideally, there would be a steady transition towards a private education model. By going the private route, children will not only have more educational options in front of them, but education reform will also save taxpayers a considerable amount of money. There are many elderly homeowners who have no kids and people without a personal connection to public education who are effectively subsidizing the education of others. Education reform is not only a question of expanding options for students but also of promoting social equity.

Who will fund national monuments in a libertarian country?

Who will fund national monuments in a libertarian country?

This article was featured in our weekly newsletter, the Liberator Online. To receive it in your inbox, sign up here. QUESTION: National landmarks such as the Jefferson Memorial, the Washington Monument and the Lincoln Memorial are symbols of national unity, strength, and sources of inspiration. They are monuments of a national republic. How would these monuments be constructed for the entire nation in a libertarian society? Monuments MY SHORT ANSWER: They would be constructed and maintained through private donations rather than taxes. Donations are given freely; taxes are forced. We honor Jefferson, Washington, and other American icons because they believed in the importance of individual freedom, even though they may not have practiced it perfectly (e.g., Jefferson had slaves). We dishonor their memory and the values they cherished by forcing our fellow Americans to pay for their memorials. Without tax funding, the edifices of these great men might be less grandiose than they are today. (Of course, they might just as well be even grander, better preserved and staffed, and better funded.) However, they would be a truer symbol of the freedom that made our nation great. Even today, many renowned historical sites and monuments are privately funded. George Washington’s home Mount Vernon — the most popular historic estate in America, open 365 days a year — has been maintained and made available to the public since 1853 by the Mount Vernon’s Ladies’ Association, which proudly declares it “does not accept grants from federal, state or local governments, and no tax dollars are expended to support its purposes.” Thomas Jefferson’s home Monticello is maintained by a private, non-profit corporation, in cooperation with the University of Virginia. Colonial Williamsburg was restored with private funds and is run as a private national museum not dependent on government funding. A libertarian society, based on free enterprise and free from today’s crippling tax burden, would be far wealthier than our society today and thus better able to fund such monuments and landmarks. And the drive to collect the funding for them could unite and inspire the country every bit as much as the actual monuments themselves.